Diversity and Ecology of Metazoan parasites of Channa gachua (Ham.) of Lake Mansar, Jammu

Ranvijay Singh *

Dean of Research Studies, The Cluster University of Jammu, Nawabad, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir 180001, India

Corresponding Author Email: ranvijaysingh172@gmail.com

DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7306307

Abstract

A study on the metazoan parasites of Channa gachua (Ham.) from Mansar Lake, Jammu was conducted and out of 240 fish hosts examined, 171 were found infected with metazoan parasites. The parasite fauna was recorded comprised of both adult and larval forms. A total of 6 adult species, which includes Digenean Trematoda:  Phyllodistomum mansari, Allocreadium  A. gachuai n. sp, Genarchopsis G. piscicola; Cestoda: Ancistrocephalus sp; Nematoda: Camallanus jammuensis n. sp., Pseudoproleptus macrognathus, and 3 larval forms; Trematoda: Clinostomum giganticum, Euclinostomum reticultum, Nematoda: Camallanus were recorded. The prevalence and mean intensity of metazoan parasites were higher in the month of summer (April to July) and falling to low during winter (December to February). Host size had a positive correlation with the prevalence and dominance of the parasites. Sex of the host had no effect on the seasonal distribution of the parasites. Allocreadium A. gachuai was the most dominant parasite community.

Keywords

channa gachua, Diversity, dominance, ecology, mean itensty, metazoan, prevalence

Download this article as:

Introduction

            Fish serve as a source of animal protein for Man. Both qualitatively and quantitatively the biology of fish parasites is little known in different water bodies of Jammu. Studies on the fish parasites from Jammu province are relatively recent [6] [32], [20], [11] [14-16] [26]

            The ecology of animal parasites is a very interesting and significant part of modern research. [5] thoroughly reviewed factors believed to be involved in the seasonal distribution of fish helminthes and discussed numerous studies dealing with several geographical areas of the world. The present investigation is the first on the diversity and ecology of metazoan parasite infecting channa gachua from lake mansar, Jammu.

Material and Methods

In total 240 Channa gachua were collected from Mansar lake Jammu. Fish were collected with the use of a steel mesh hand net and variable mesh gill nets. Fish were transported to the laboratory alive, measured, sexed, and necropsied within 24 hrs of collection. The alimentary canal viscera and Gonads were removed and placed in separate Petri dishes containing normal saline. The parasites were fixed the acetic acid – formalin-alcohol stained the various carmine stains and prepared as a whole mount. All measurements are in millimeters. The nomenclature to define ecological parameters is under that of [19] and significance is taken at P<0.05. Only adult parasites were subjected to ecological analysis. Dominance is the total number of individuals of a particular parasite species expressed as a percentage of the total number of all parasites in that sample.

Results and Discussion

During the investigation period, the fish Channa gachua was parasitized by 9 different parasite species of which 6 were found as adult parasites and three as larval parasites.  Of the adult species of parasites, 3 species were of digenean trematodes (Phyllodistomum mansari, Allocreadium  A. gachuai n. sp, Genarchopsis G. piscicola); 1 of a cestode (Ancistrocephalus sp;) and 2 of a nematode  (Camallanus jammuensis n. sp., Pseudoproleptus macrognathus). The other three species, which were found as larval stages included 2 clinostome metacercaria (Clinostomum giganticum, Euclinostomum reticultum) and nematode larvae (Camallanus sp. ) Diversity and infection prevalence of the metazoan is represented in table 1. 

Diversity analysis

Phyllodistomum mansari    Sudan, 1979 [32]

Family: Gorgoderidae (Loss, 1899) Loss, 1901.

Sub-family: Phyllodistominae [24] [34]

Location: Intestine

The worms describe belong to Phyllodistomum Braun, 1899 for reasons;

two unbranched testes,  uterus not spreading into the lateral field of forebody, absence of cirrus pouch, and presence of laurel’s canal.

Alloceradium Alloceradium gachuai n.sp.

Family: Alloceradidae (Loss, 1902) Stossich, 1903 [31].

Sub-Family: Alloceradinae, Loss, 1902

Location: Intestine

The worm belongs to the genus Alloceradium because, the vitelleria are spread in the hind body extending but only a little into the fore body, but no further cephlad of the ovary, an oral sucker is non appendiculate.

Genarchopsis Genarchopsis piscicola   Srivastava, 1933 [30]

Family :Hemiuridae Luhe, 1901 [17]

Subfamily: Helipeginae Ejmont, 1931

Location: Intestine

The worms fall under the genus Genarchopsis  [25], due to; a tubular parsprostatica, a prostatic complex enclosed in a thin-walled sac, simple hermaphroditic duct, Posteriorly united caeca.

Ancistrocephalus sp. Monticelli, 1890 [21]

Order: Pseudophyllidea,  Carus, 1863 [3]

Family: Triaenophoridae, Lonnberg, 1889 [13]

Location: Intestine

The worms assigned to genus Ancistrocephalus sp.  [21] for reasons of; having a scolex with an apical disc armed with a  circle of small hooks, Conspicuous neck, distinct external metamerism, proglottids broader than long and craspedote, testes irregularly confined in two lateral fields, a posteriorly placed bilobed ovary,  uterus narrowly coiled with expanded terminal ends, uterine pore mid ventral near the anterior end of proglottids, operculated embryonated eggs.

Camallanus Jammuensis n. sp.

Family: Camallanidae,  Railliet and Henry, 1915 [27].

Location: Intestine

The worms belong to Genus Camallanus [27] due to Stoma consisting of chitnous valves with a well developed white chitinous ring in the base, trident two, chitnous, one ventral and other dorsal, spicules two, unequal, genital papillae 10-13 pairs, vulva pre equatorial backed up by muscular vagina.

Pseudoproleptus macrognathus Gupta and Bakshi, 1984 [8]

Family: Cystidicolidae Chabud, 1975

Location: Intestine

The worms belong to Genus Pseudoproleptus macrognathus [8] for the reasons of mouth bounded by two lateral lips, each with a single tooth and one pair of sub-median papillae, esophagus bipartite,  vulva post equatorial, vagina directed posteriorly, consist of small  ovijector and leaves into two uteri.

Clinostomum giganticum Agarwal, 1960 [1]

(Metacercarial Stage)

Family: Clinostomidae Luhe, 1901 [18]

Sub-Family: Clinostominae

Location: Body Cavity, Muscles, attached to the external intestinal wall, Liver and Air Bladder

The metacercarial fall under genus Clinostomum Leidy, 1956 because;  the oral sucker is surrounded by the collar like fold, acetabulum pre-equatorial, larger and muscular, excretory vesicle V-Shaped with sub-terminal excretory pore.

Euclimostomum reticulum Sudan, 1979 [32]

Family: Clinostomidae Luhe, 1901 [17]

Sub-Family: Euclinostominae Yamaguti, 1958 [34]

Location: Body Cavity, Muscles and Liver

The worm belongs to Euclimostomum Travassos 1928 because of aspinose cuticle, strongly diverticulated ceaca, and highly glandular network of glandular body lying around the  acetabulum up to the anterior testis.

Camallanus larvae

Family: Camallanidae,  Railliet & Henry, 1915 [27]

Location: Intestine

The larval form belongs to genus Camallanus for the reason of a bipartite esophagus and each part ending in globular enlargement.

Ecological analysis

Seasonal infection patterns

The prevalence and intensity of the most frequently encountered metazoan, Phyllodistomum mansari, Allocreadium  A. gachuai n. sp, Genarchopsis G. piscicola, Ancistrocephalus sp. and Cammallanus jammuensis varied from season to season (Table 2). The prevalence and mean intensity of infection were high during the month of Summer (April to July) and fell to low during winter (December-February) indicating a cryptic relationship between temperature and infectivity of a parasite.  While studying the seasonal distribution of helminth parasites of fish Cyrinus carpio [33] recorded similar variations in prevalence and mean intensity.[2] reported that temperature in conjugation with day length affects the feeding activity of the fish and indirectly the immigration rate of parasites.

Effect of Host Size

Correlation analysis between host size and parasite dominance indicates that of the most common 5 metazoan parasites recovered (Table 3)  A.A. gchuai (r = 0.99), P. mansari (r = 0.796) and Ancistrocephalus sp. (r = 0.483) showed the highest dominance of the size group of 70-90. On the other hand, C. jammuensis (r = 0.883) dominated in the fish size group of 130-150 body length, whereas G.G.Pissicola (r = -0.279) dominated in the fishes still higher age group of 150-170 body length.  With the increase in the size of the host, the parasite diversity and mean intensity also increased could be a result of increased food intake with increasing size (hence of increasing age) during which an involuntary increased number of infected transport hosts are eaten by the fish, leading thereby to increase the species richness (= diversity) or increased intensity of one or few of the parasites harboured at the time by the fish.

Allocreadium A. gachuai, the most dominant component of the parasite community (Tables 1-3) infected around 20% of the hosts examined, which in terms of prevalence comes next only to that of Phyllodistomum mansari in C. gachua (27.5%). The parasite was the most intense (mean intensity; 8.54) and constituted 50.56% of all the adult parasites found in this fish, varying in intensity between 1 and 25. The prevalence of this parasite varied in different size classes of the fish between 13 and 28.6 and the mean intensity increased as the fish became bigger. The older the fish becomes the higher its warm load. The correltion coefficient between the intensity of A. A. gachuai and fish size was significant (r = 0.99; p < .01).

When viewed from the angle of dominance index (Table 3), a marked decline for most parasite taxa in fish hosts above 170 lengths was evident, this drop in the sustainability of older hosts for larger loads of parasites can only be attributed to either inherent resistance to parasites or age-related acquired resistance of hosts against parasites. Hence a general tendency among fish hosts for increased resistance to parasitic infections with an increase in the size (age) of the hosts may be more or less a generalized phenomenon.

[12] reported that the fish catostomus commersoni in the 5 and 5+ year classes had the heaviest infection of Glaridacris catostomi. [23] reported that the prevalence and mean intensity of Glaridacris castostami increased as host length increased.  [10] found the number of Caryophyllidlaeus simriceps decreased as carp become older and suggested that this was due to age-related immunity. [28] reported that prevalence of Capillaria laticeps decreased with age of chubb, Leuciscus idus and attributed this decrease to the non-benthic habits of older fish. However, [9] and [29] both working with P. laevis, and Muzzaill (1980b) working with P. bulbocolli, found that acanthoception mean intensity increased with host age and size. [33] reported that prevalence and mean intensity of K. iowensis increased as fish length increased.

Effect of Host sex

Host sex was not found to be a significant factor in determining the infection rate of Phyllodistomum mansari, Allocreadium  A. gachuai, Genarchopsis G. piscicola, Ancistrocephalus sp, and Camallanus jammuensis.  Similar results were reported by [12] [22-23] and [33].

CONSENT AND ETHICAL APPROVAL

As per university standard guidelines, participant consent and ethical approval have been collected and preserved by the authors

Competing interests

Authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

AUTHORS CONTRIBUTIONS

The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

References

  1. Agarwal, S.M. 1960. Studies on the morphology, systematic, and life history of Clinostomum giganticum n. sp. Ind. Jour. Helminth., 11(2) : 75-115.
  2. Anderson, R.M., 1974. Population dynamics of the cestode Carryophyllaeus laticeph (Pallas 1781) in the bream (Abramis brama L. ). Anim. Ecol., 43 : 305-321.
  3. Carus, J.V. 1863. Cf. Schmidt, G.D. 1970. How to know the tapeworms. W.M.C. Brown Company Publishers (Dubuque, Lowa) : 1-261.
  4. Chabaud, A.G. 1975. CIH keys to the nematode parsites of vertebrates. Anderson, R.C., Chabaud, A.G. and Willmott, S. (Eds.). No. 3 keys to the genera of the order Spirurida Part 1. Camallanoidea, Dracunculoidea and Gnathostomatoidea, Physalopteroidea, Rictularioidea and Thelazoidea Englland : Commonwealth, Agricultural Bureaux, 27 pp.
  5. Chubb. J.C. 1981. Seasonal occurrence of helminthes in freshwater fishes. Part IV. Adult Cestoda, Nematoda and Acanthocephala. Adv. Parasitol. 20 : 1-292.
  6. Duda, P.L. & Jyoti, M.K. 1978. Isopaorchis hypselobagri – a vagrant parasite inside fish (Abst.). First Asian Cong. Parasit., Bombay : 67.
  7. Ejsmont, L. 1931. Uber die Identitat von Prosphytrea rosittensis Korkhaus und Tanaisia fedtchenkoi Skrjabin, nebst einigen Bemerkungen uber Trematoden mit verbundenen Darmschenkeln. Nat. S.B. Nat. (II) : 531-547.
  8. Gupta V. & Bakshi, R. 1984. Nematode parasites of fishes II. On two new species of the genus Pseudoproleptus Khera, 1953  (Spirurida, Physaloperidae) from freshwater fishes of India. Acta Parasit. Polonica. 29(23) : 203-209.
  9. Hine, P.M. and Kennedy, C.R. 1974. The population biology of the acanthocephalan. Pamphorhynchus laevis (Miller) in the River Avon J. Fish Biol. 6 : 665-679.
  10. Kanaev. A.I. 1956, Carypohylliasis in carp and methods of controlling it. (In Russian.) Avotoreferat Mosrybvtuz. 1956 : 137-149.
  11. Khar, H.K. 1985. Studies on the larval ecology of trematodes in some water bodies of Jammu. Ph.D. Thesis submitted to the University of Jammu (Unpublished).
  12. Lawrence, J.C. 1970. Effect of Season, host age and sex on endahelminths of Catostomus commersoni. J. Parssitol. 56 : 567-571.
  13. Lonnberg, E. 1889. Bidrag till Kannedomen om I Sverige forekommande Cestoder. Bihang K. Svenska Vetensk-Akad. Stockholm.,  14, Afd. Iv, (9).
  14. Looss, A. 1899. Wietere Beitrage Zur kenntnis der Trematodenfauna Aegyptens, Zugleich Versuch einer naturlichen Gliederung des genus Distomum  Retzius. Zool. Jahrb. Syst. 12 : 521-784.
  15. Looss, A. 1901. Uber Trematoden aus Seeschildkroten der Egyptischen Kusten (Notizen Zur Helminthologie Egyptens). 4. Centralbl. Bakteriol., 30 : 566-569.
  16. Looss, A. 1902. Uber neve und bekannte Trematoden aus Schildkroten, nebst Erorterung Zur Systematik und Nomenklatur. Zool. Jahrb. Syst. 16 (3-6) : 411-894.
  17. Luhe, M.  1901. Uber Hemiuriden. Zool. Anz.  24 : 394-403, 473-488.
  18. Luhe, M.  1901. Zwei neue Distomen aus indischen. Anuren. Ctbl. Bakt. L. Abt., 30 : 166-177.
  19. Margolis, L.; Esch, G.W.; Holmes, J.C.; Kuris, A.M. & Schad, G.A. 1982. The use of ecological terms in parasitology (report of an adhoc committee of the American Society of Parastilogists). J. Parasitol., 68 : 131-133.
  20. Meenakshi. 1984. Studies on the parasites of freshwater fishes of J&K State. M.Phil. Dissertation submitted to University of Jammu (Unpublished).
  21. Monticelli, F.S. 1890. Elenco degli elminti studiati a Wimereux nella primavera del 1889. Bull. Sci. France et Belqique, 22 : 417-444.
  22. Muzzall, P.M. 1980a. Seasonal distribution and ecology of three caryophyllaeid cestode species infecting white sucker in S.E. New Hampshire. J. Parasitol. 66 : 542-550.
  23. Muzzall, P.M. 1980b. Ecology and seasonal abundance of three acanthocephalan species infecting while suckers in SE New Hampshire. J. Parasitol 66 : 127-133.
  24. Nybelin, O. 1926. Zur Helminthenfauna der Susswasserfische Schwedens. I. Phyllodistomum. Got. Kungl. Vitt. Samh. Handl. 31(3) : 29.
  25. Ozaki, Y. 1925. On a new genus of fish trematodes, Genarchopsis, and a new species of Asymphylodora. Jap. J. Zool. 1 : 101-108.
  26. Pandoh, B.R. 1992. Ecological studies on trematode of some aquatic vertebrates of Jammu Province. Ph.D. A thesis submitted to University of Jammu (Unpublished).
  27. Railliet, A. & Henry, A. 1915. Sur les Nematodes du genre camallanus Railliet and Henry, 1915 (Cucullanus Auct., Von Mueller, 1777). Bull. Soc. Path. Exot., 8 : 446-452.
  28. Rakova, V.M. 1953. Invasion dyndamics in ide fish. In Contributions to helminthology published to commemorate the 75th birthday of K.I. Skrjabin. Edited by A.M.Petrov. et al. Academy of Science of the U.S.S.R. Moscow. (English translation, Israel Program of Scientific Translations, Jerusalem, 1966).
  29. Rumpus, A.E. 1975. The helminth parasites of bullhead cottus gobio (L.) and the stone loach Neomacheilus barbatulus (L) from the river Avon. Hemisphere. J. Fish Biol. 7 : 469-483.
  30. Srivastava, H.D. 1933. On new trematodes of frogs and fishes of the United Provinces, India. Part I. Distomes of the family Hemiuridae from North Indian fishes and frogs with a systematic discussion on the family Helipegidae and the genera Vitellotrema Guberlet and Genarchopsis Ozaki. Bull. Acad. Sci. U.P. Agra and Oudh. Allahabad, 3(1) : 41-60.
  31. Stossich, M. 1903. Note Distomatologiche. Boll. Soc. Adriat. Sci. Nat. 21 : 193-201.
  32. Sudan, O.S. 1979. Studies on trematode fauna of Jammu Province. Ph.D. thesis submitted to the University of Jammu. (Unpublished).
  33. Sutherland, D.R. 1989. Seasonal distribution and ecology of thre helminth species infecting carp (Cyrinus carpio) in northwest Inova U.S.A. Can. J. Zool. 67 :  692-698.
  34. Yamaguti, S. 1958. Systema Helminthum Vol. I. The digenetic trematodes of vertebrates. Interscience, New York.