Biological response of Anticarsia gemmatalis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to Bacillus thuringiensis berliner var. kurstaki at sublethal concentrations

Rafael Coelho Ribeiro 1 , Hany Armed Fouad 2 , Evaldo Morais da Silva3 , Mariana Casari Parreira4 , Jefferson dos Santos Martins 5 , Sinara Dias Silva 6 , Paula Emanuelly Pantoja Lobato 7 , Ana Laura Pinheiro Ruivo Monteiro8 , Cleia Gomes Vieira e Silva Medeiros 9 , , Elonha Rodrigues dos Santos10

1Universidade Federal do Pará – UFPA, Tv padre Antônio franco s/n-Brazil

2Sohag University, Faculty of Agriculture, Plant Protection Department, Egypt

3Universidade Federal do Pará, Tv padre Antônio franco s/n, Brazil

4Universidade dos Açores, Instituto de Investigação e Tecnologias Agrárias e do Ambiente (IITAA), Rua Capitão João D'Ávila, São Pedro, 9700- 042, Angra do Heroísmo, Açores, Portugal

5Universidade Rural da Amazônia- UFRA, aveninda presidente trancredo neves, n° 2501, bairro terra irme, cep: 66077830, Belém-Pa., Brazil

6 Instituto Agro lorestal de Assessoria Técnica da Amazônia, Rua 24 de outubro, 236 - São Benedito, CEP: 68400-000 - Cametá-Pa, Brazil

7Universidad Federal do Pará ;Endereço Completo da Instituição: Tv Padre Antônio Franco, Cametá/PA, Brazil

8Universidade Federal do Pará. Campus Guamá/Belém, Av. Augusto Corrêa, no 1, Guamá, Belém (PA) - CEP: 66.075-110, Brazil

9Instituto Federal de Roraima, Campus Novo Paraíso, Vila de Novo Paraíso, Km 512, BR 174, no município de Caracaraí, Roraima, Brazil

10Instituto Multidisciplinar de Rondônia - MULTIRON Faculdade Santo André – FASA, Rua Aníbal Ribeiro Batista; número:4078; Residencial Orleans; CEP: 76985-784 - Vilhena – RO, Brazil

Corresponding Author Email: evaldomorais@ufpa.br

DOI : https://doi.org/10.51470/ABF.2024.4.2.39

Abstract

The soybean caterpillar, Anticarsia gemmatalis Hubner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), damages this plant. This pest is controlled, mainly, with chemical products which makes it necessary to to develop management strategies for its management in the soybean crop. Feeding and development of A. gemmatalis larvae fed on soybean leaves treated with Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner var. kurstaki at different concentrations (0,5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 μg.mL-1 ) for 24 h were studied in the laboratory. The LC50 and LC90 after 24 h from hatching and at the last instar, development period, adult emergence, weight gain by larva, pupa weight, and dry food weight ingested besides of A. gemmatalis were evaluated. The LC90 value decrease with the development of this insect. Mortality in the third instar of this pest was proportional to the B. thuringiensis concentrations. Emergence of A. gemmatalis adults was higher with 0,5 μg.mL-1 concentration of this bacterium and in the control.

Keywords

Download this article as:

INTRODUÇÃO

Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] has great social and economic value as one of the largest vegetable oil sources with low cost and high protein content for human and animal consumption [3]. Anticarsia gemmatalis Hubner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), a key pest of the soybean crops in Brazil and other American countries, causes extreme defoliation with a caterpillar consuming about 110 cm2 of soybean leaves, This makes necessary applications of chemical insecticides in areas with A. gemmatalis occurrence, but alternative methods are necessary to manage this pest. The biology of A. gemmatalis was studied in the field [7] and this this pest has, normally, five to six instars, with some individuals reaching eight instars [5].

Synthetic insecticides have ecological and toxicological risks, besides high costs, while alternative methods of pest control can be cheaper [14]. Microorganisms used in biological control programs of insect pests, especially from the eighties, reduced conventional insecticide use, lowered environmental contamination, and could increase cultivation revenues [10]. Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), a soil bacteria that produces crystals (cry), has high toxicity to insect pests and is globally considered an effective biopesticide. The toxicity of Bt to insects is due to its proteins of molecular mass ranging from 25 kDa to 140 kDa [4].

The objectives are to study mortality, and development of immature and biological parameters of the soybean caterpillar with B. thuringiensis var. kurstak (Dipel WP®) at sub-lethal concentrations.

MATERIAL E MÉTODOS

Soybean caterpillars were obtained from mass rearing of the Laboratory of Biological Control of the Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) in Viçosa, Minas Gerais state, Brazil and maintained under laboratory conditions at 25,0 ± 4°C, relative humidity of 70 ± 4%, and photoperiod of 12 hours.

Soybean plants were grown in plastic pots in a greenhouse of the UFV without pesticide use. Fresh leaves of soybean were collected and transferred to laboratory. Disks (10,75 cm2) from leaves of these plants were prepared one hour before the experiment.

The experiment was carried out in the Laboratory of Biological Control of the Institute of Applied Biotechnology (BIOAGRO) of the UFV. The Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki (Dipel WP® 16,000 ITU.mg-1) activity was studied with newly emerged A. gemmatalis caterpillars in plastic containers (500 mL) with artificial diet until the third instar, when they were individualized in Petri dish (9 cm diameter) for 24 hours without food. Five concentrations (0,5; 1; 2; 4; 6; 8 μg mL) of B. thuringiensis were tested, and the control had distilled water. Twenty disks (10,75 cm2) of soybean leaves per B. thuringiensis concentration were dipped for ten seconds and left for thirty minutes to dry under laboratory conditions. After this period, the leaves were transferred to Petri dishes (9,0 x 1,5 cm), each with one A. gemmatalis larva. Four replications were used with one larva of this pest each one with soybean leaf disks treated with B. thuringiensis according to the treatment or in the control. After this, larvae were transferred to an artificial diet to complete their life cycle.

The LC50 and LC90 after 24 h and at last instar, development period (third instar to end of pupa period), larva weight gain, pupa weight, and dry weight of food ingested and feces were evaluated to obtain the B. thuringiensis effect on A. gemmatalis development and biology. The weight was obtained with an analytical precision scale (± 0,001 g) in milligrams.

Mortality (%) of A. gemmatalis was corrected with Abbott’s formula [1]. The effective B. thuringiensis concentration was analyzed using probit. Data from the biology experiment was subjected to variance analysis (ANOVA). Differences between treatments were determined by Tukey’s significant difference test (P ≤ 0,05).

RESULTADOS E DISCUSSÃO

The B. thuringiensis effects on third instar A. gemmatalis larvae showed that this insect is more susceptible at early than at later instars. The mortality of this pest was higher after 4 μg.mL-1 than with other concentrations lower (Figure 1). The a toxicity de LC90 of B. thuringiensis in after larva period was folding higher than the LC90 for the 24 h after treatment.

The development of caterpillars neonates at end of pupa period (days), weight gain, pupa weight, and dry weight of food ingested and faeces on larva of A. gemmatalis was not modified after treatment with B. thuringiensis at all

Means followed by the same letter (s), per row, do not differ at 5% probability according to Tukey test. Statistical analyzes was not made with 6 and 8 μg/mL concentrations due to their number of replications lower than three of larvae completing this stage. * From 3rd instar larvae at end of pupal period.

The survival of A. gemmatalis third instar caterpillars varied with the concentrations B. thuringiensis (0,5; 6 and 8 μg.mL-1 ). The percentage of adult emergence of this pest decreased as the B. thuringiensis concentrations

The Cry proteins of the bacterium B. thuringiensis kill Lepidoptera insect pests [6]  with lower environmental impact than most chemical insecticides [8]. Differences in A. gemmatalis susceptibility to the B. thuringiensis concentrations may be due to the protein Cry 1Ba levels from the gene Cry1B [12].

The increasing mortality (%) of A. gemmatalis third instar larvae after 24 h, starting at the concentration of 4 μg.mL-1 in a dose-dependent manner, will reduce adult emergence at higher B. thuringiensis. These results are similar to those of other studies with this bacteria on Apis mellifera Linnaeus (Hymenoptera: Apidae), Ostrinia nubilalis (Hiibner) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae, Diatraea saccharalis Fabr. (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) and storage pests [7-9]. Bacillus thuringiensis crystals are solubilized and activated by proteases in the insect midgut. The δ-endotoxins (Cry toxins) bind to midgut epithelial cells; and form pores, causing cytoplasm vacuolization and increasing cellular volume cell lysis which eventually leads to insect death [10].

Lower values of the LC50 and LC90 for A. gemmatalis at the larva period end compared to those after 24 hours may be due to the action mode of B. thuringiensis needing 24 h to express its toxicity. Besides the impact of this bacterium reduces the energy (i.e., total protein, glycogen, and lipids) by lowering food digestion due to its toxic effect reducing digestive enzymes as a-amilase e proteases. Besides, B. thuringiensis toxins bind to cell receptors of the epithelial of the medium intestine resulting in its perforation [15].

The lack of impact on development period, last instar larvae, and pupa weight with B. thuringiensis concentrations lower than 4 μg.mL-1 will allow the larva recovering after healing its medium intestine. This is due to low B. thuringiensis toxins binding to medium intestin receptors or to insecticide activation by insect proteases [2]. Similar effects were reported on larva and pre-pupa (days), pupa weight (g), sex ratio, survival (%) and larvae-adult period of Spodoptera cosmioides (Walker, 1858) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) submitted to this protein Cry1Ac, even being specific to Lepidoptera [13]. The mortality of third instar A. gemmatalis was higher with B. thuringiensis at the concentration of 4 μg.mL-1 or higher in a dose-dependent manner, without effect in the biological parameters studied.

  •  

References

  1. Abbott, W.S. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. Journal of Economic Entomology, v.18, n.2, p. 265–267, 1925. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/18.2.265a.
  1. Aranda, E.; Sanchez, J.; Peferoen, M.; Güereca, L.; Bravo, A. Interactions of Bacillus thuringiensis crystal proteins with the midgut epithelial cells of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal Invertebrate Pathology, v.68, n.3, p.203–212, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1006/jipa.1996.0087.
  1. Boerema, A.; Peeters, A.; Swolfs, S.; Vandevenne, F.; Jacobs, S. Staes, J.; Meire, P. Soybean trade: balancing environmental and socio-economic impacts of an intercontinental market. PLos ONE, 2016.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155222.
  1. Bravo, A.; Gomez, I.; Conde, J.; Munoz-Garay, C.; Sanchez, J.; Miranda, R.; Zhuang, M.; Gill, S.; Soberon, M. Oligomerization triggers binding of a Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab pore-forming toxin to aminopeptidase N receptor leading to insertion into membrane microdomains. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, v.1667, n.1, p.38–46, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2004.08.013.
  1. Conti, L.; Waddill, V. Development of velvetbean caterpillar, Anticarsia gemmatalis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on several winter hosts. Environmental Entomology, v.11, n.5, p.1112–1113, 1982. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/11.5.1112.
  1. Elleuch, J.; Jaoua, S.; Ginibre, C.; Chandre, F.; Tounsi, S.; Zghal, R.Z. Toxin stability improvement and toxicity increase against dipteran and lepidopteran larvae of Bacillus thuringiensis crystal protein Cry2Aa. Pest Management Science, v.72, n.12, p.2240–2246, 2016. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ps.4261/full.
  1. Huang, F.; Leonard, B.R.; Wu, X. Resistance of sugarcane borer to Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab toxin. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, v.124, n.1, p.117–123, 2007. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1570-7458.2007.00560.x/full.
  1. Lacey, L.A.; Frutos, R.; Kaya, H.K.; Vail, P. Insect pathogens as biological control agents: do they have a future? Biological Control, v.21, n.3, p.230–248, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1006/bcon.2001.0938.
  1. Oppert, B.; Ellis, R.T.; Babcok, J. Effect of Cry34Ab1/35Ab1 on storage pests. Journal of  Stored Products Research, v.46, n.3, p.143–148, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2010.01.003.
  1. Palma, L.; Del Valle, E.E. The fungus Nomuraea rileyi growing on dead larvae of Anticarsia gemmatalis associated with soybean plants (Glycine max) in Esperanza (Argentina). Revista Argentina de Microbiologia, v.47, n.3, p.277–278, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ram.2015.06.004.
  1. Palma, L.; Muñoz, D.; Berry, C.; Murillo, J.; Caballero, P. Bacillus thuringiensis toxins: an overview of their biocidal activity. Toxins, v.6, n.12, p.3296–3325, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins6123296.
  1. Silva, M.C.; Siqueira, H.A.A.; Silva, L.M.; Marques, E.J.; Barros, R. Cry Proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis active against diamondback moth and fall armyworm. Neotropical Entomology, v.44, n.4, p.392–401, 2015. doi: 10.1007/s13744-015-0302-9.

13. Silva, G.V.; Bueno, A.F.; Bortolotto, O.C.; Santos, A.C.; Pomari-Fernandes, A. Biological characteristics of black armyworm Spodoptera cosmioides on genetically modified soybean and corn crops that express insecticide Cry proteins. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, v.60, n.3, p.255–259, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbe.2016.04.005.

  1. Tavares, W.S.; Akhtar, Y.; Gonçalves, G.L.P.; Zanuncio, J.C.; Isman, M.B. Turmeric powder and its derivatives from Curcuma longa rhizomes: Insecticidal effects on cabbage looper and the role of synergists. Scientific Reports, v.6, p.1–11, 2016. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5090202/.
  1. Zhu, Y.C.; Abel, C.A.; Chen, M. Interaction of Cry1Ac toxin (Bacillus thuringiensis) and proteinase inhibitors on the growth, development, and midgut proteinase activities of the bollworm, Helicoverpa zea. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, v.87, n.1, p.39–46, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2006.05.004.

Figure 1 Concentration–mortality responses of Anticarsia gemmatalis after 24 hours feeding on soybean leaf treated with Bacillus thuringiensis sub-lethal concentrations. Means followed by the same letter (s) do not differ at 5% according to Tukey test.

Figure 2 Anticarsia gemmatalis adult emergence (%) with different concentrations of Bacillus thuringiensis. Means followed by the same letter (s) do not differ at 5% according to Tukey test.